Do I Have a Breach of Contract Case?
April 28, 2023

If you have been harmed due to a breach of contract, you may be wondering about your legal rights and whether it makes sense to proceed with legal action. Breaches of contract can be minor, and some can be resolved without the need to hire an attorney. However, many breaches involve large sums of money and complex issues that require legal counsel to resolve.

 

What is a Breach of Contract?

 

A breach of contract can occur in various situations where one party fails to perform its obligations under a valid contract. Here are a few examples of common scenarios where a breach of contract claim may arise:

 

  • Employment Contracts — An employer fails to provide agreed-upon compensation or benefits to its employee, or an employee fails to deliver promised services.

 

  • Real Estate Contracts — A party fails to complete a real estate transaction, such as failing to provide promised funds or failing to release a lien.

 

  • Construction Contracts —  A contractor fails to complete the project as outlined in their agreement, deviates from building specifications, or fails to deliver the project within the agreed-upon deadline.

 

  • Sales Contracts — A seller fails to deliver goods or services as specified in a contract, or a buyer fails to provide payment according to the agreed payment terms.

 

  • Service Contracts — A party fails to provide services according to the terms of the contract, breaches confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, or fails to meet deadlines.

 

  • Lease Contracts — A tenant fails to pay rent or breaches other terms of the lease agreement, or a landlord fails to repair or maintain the premises as outlined in the lease.

 

What Legal Recourse Do I Have if I Am Harmed Due to a Breach of Contract?

 

If someone breaches a contract that you are a party to, you may have several courses of action, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. Some of the most common legal remedies that may be available to you include:

 

Damages

You may be able to seek monetary damages to compensate you for any financial losses you suffered as a result of the breach. This could include any direct financial losses or consequential damages that you incurred due to the breach.

 

Specific Performance

In some cases, a court may order the breaching party to perform specific obligations outlined in the contract. Specific performance can be an appropriate remedy in situations where damages would not be sufficient to correct the harm caused by the breach.

 

Rescission

If the breach was so severe that it makes the contract unenforceable, you may be able to seek rescission of the contract. Rescission would annul the contract, requiring both parties to return to their original state before the contract was signed.

 

Reformation

If the terms of the contract were ambiguous or poorly written and resulted in a breach, you may be able to request that the court reform the contract's terms to more accurately reflect the parties' intentions.

 

Mitigation of Damages

It's important to undertake reasonable actions to reduce the amount of damage incurred as a result of the breach. For example, if a breach of contract involves the delivery of goods that are not up to the agreed quality standards, the damaged party should take steps to limit additional damages by not accepting the goods or returning them.

 

Contact Deppman Law PLC Today

 

The recourse that you have when a contract is breached depends on the severity of the breach, the language in the contract, and the laws governing the contract. It's always best to speak with an experienced VT breach of contract attorney who can help you understand your options and the best course of action to take in your particular case. Contact Deppman Law PLC today for a confidential consultation about your case.


March 21, 2025
For many couples, the family home is more than just their biggest financial asset—it’s also where memories were made, children were raised, and routines were built. So when a marriage ends, one of the most emotionally and financially significant questions becomes: What happens to the house? In Vermont, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The outcome depends on a range of factors, including how the property was acquired, whose name is on the deed, and what’s considered “equitable” under state law. Vermont Is an Equitable Distribution State Unlike community property states, where marital assets are divided 50/50, Vermont follows equitable distribution rules. That means the court aims for a division of property that is fair, but not necessarily equal. When it comes to the house, the court will look at the full picture to determine who should receive it—or whether it should be sold. Is the Home Marital Property? The first step in deciding what happens to the house is to determine whether it’s considered marital property or separate property. Marital property generally includes any property acquired by either spouse during the marriage, regardless of whose name is on the deed. Separate property is usually property owned by one spouse before the marriage, inherited individually, or received as a gift—though even separate property can become marital under certain conditions. For example, if one spouse bought the home before the marriage but both spouses contributed to the mortgage or improvements, the house (or at least part of its value) may be treated as marital property. What Factors Does the Court Consider? When deciding what to do with the house, Vermont courts look at a number of factors to determine what’s fair. These include: The length of the marriage Each spouse’s contributions (financial and non-financial) The needs of any children Each spouse’s earning potential and financial circumstances Whether one spouse wants to keep the home and can afford to do so Whether one spouse has primary custody of the children and would benefit from staying in the home Common Outcomes for the House in Divorce Depending on the circumstances, there are several ways the home can be handled: 1. One Spouse Buys Out the Other If one spouse wants to keep the home, they may buy out the other spouse’s share. This typically involves refinancing the mortgage in their own name and paying the other spouse their portion of the home’s equity. 2. The Home Is Sold and the Proceeds Are Split This is often the simplest option, particularly if neither spouse can afford to keep the house on their own or if neither wants it. The couple sells the house and divides the equity according to the divorce agreement or court order. 3. One Spouse Stays Temporarily In some cases, especially where children are involved, one spouse may stay in the home for a set period of time (e.g., until the youngest child turns 18), after which the home is sold and the proceeds divided. 4. Both Spouses Continue to Co-Own Rare, but possible—especially if the real estate market is poor or the home has sentimental value. This requires careful planning, clear agreements about expenses and responsibilities, and an exit plan. Don’t Forget the Tax and Mortgage Implications Whatever the outcome, it’s important to consider: Mortgage liability— If both spouses are on the mortgage, both are responsible—even if one moves out. Capital gains taxes— Selling a home may trigger taxes on the profit, though married couples can often exclude up to $500,000 in gains if certain conditions are met. Refinancing challenges— The spouse keeping the home must qualify on their own for refinancing. These financial and tax issues are why it’s important to work with both a divorce attorney and a financial advisor during this process. Need Help Managing Property Division? Contact Deppman Law PLC Dividing property—especially the family home—can be one of the most difficult aspects of divorce. At Deppman Law PLC , we’re here to help you understand your rights, evaluate your options, and reach a fair and sustainable resolution. Contact us today for a confidential consultation about your case.
February 19, 2025
In Vermont, tenants enjoy strong legal protections, and landlords must follow specific procedures when seeking to remove a tenant from a rental property. One of the most important requirements is having “just cause” for the eviction—especially when dealing with month-to-month or subsidized tenancies. At Deppman Law PLC , we regularly advise both landlords and tenants on their rights and responsibilities under Vermont’s landlord-tenant laws. Today, we’ll walk through what “just cause” means, what qualifies, and how the rules apply depending on the type of tenancy. What Does “Just Cause” Mean? “Just cause” means that a landlord must have a legally valid reason to evict a tenant. In many Vermont municipalities—including Burlington and other communities with local rental ordinances—just cause eviction laws are in place to prevent landlords from evicting tenants arbitrarily or without reason. Even where no local ordinance exists, state law still provides baseline protections. For subsidized housing (such as Section 8 or other public housing programs), federal and state rules require landlords to have just cause before terminating a lease—even at the end of the lease term. Common “Just Cause” Grounds for Eviction in Vermont While the specific language of just cause ordinances can vary slightly from one locality to another, the following are widely recognized as legal grounds for eviction in Vermont: 1. Nonpayment of Rent This is one of the most common reasons for eviction. If a tenant fails to pay rent on time, a landlord may serve a notice to pay or quit. If payment isn’t made, the landlord can file for eviction—but only after giving proper notice, typically 14 days under Vermont law. 2. Violation of Lease Terms If a tenant breaches a condition of the lease—such as subletting without permission, having unauthorized pets, or damaging the property—the landlord may pursue eviction. However, landlords must give the tenant written notice of the violation and may be required to give them time to correct the issue. 3. Illegal Activity Engaging in illegal activity on the premises, such as drug use or distribution, may be grounds for immediate eviction. The landlord must still provide appropriate notice and evidence of the conduct in court. 4. Material Health and Safety Violations If the tenant is creating conditions that endanger health or safety—for example, hoarding, failing to dispose of garbage, or disabling smoke detectors—these actions may support a just cause eviction. 5. Owner Move-In or Substantial Renovation Some Vermont cities allow eviction if the landlord or a family member intends to move into the unit or if the property requires major renovations that necessitate vacancy. This must be handled carefully and often requires advance notice (typically 90 days) and documentation. 6. Refusal to Sign a New Lease (If Reasonable) If a tenant refuses to sign a lease renewal with reasonable and legal changes, this may be considered just cause for non-renewal or eviction. What Is Not Just Cause? Landlords cannot evict tenants for discriminatory reasons, retaliate against tenants for asserting their legal rights (like complaining to the health department), or remove tenants without cause if local ordinances require it. For example: A tenant cannot be evicted simply because the landlord wants a different tenant. You cannot evict a tenant for reporting code violations or requesting repairs. You cannot remove a tenant based on race, gender, family status, religion, or other protected categories under state and federal fair housing laws. Just Cause Requirements Vary by Municipality Some Vermont towns and cities—most notably Burlington —have their own “just cause eviction” ordinances that provide additional tenant protections. For example, Burlington’s ordinance passed in 2022 requires landlords to have just cause for any termination of a residential lease, including month-to-month leases. Landlords operating in these municipalities must be careful to comply not only with state law but also with local ordinances, which may require longer notice periods or restrict certain grounds for eviction altogether. The Importance of Proper Procedure Even with just cause, landlords must follow specific legal procedures for eviction. This includes: Serving the correct type of notice (14, 30, or 60 days depending on the cause and lease type) Filing a court complaint if the tenant doesn’t vacate Obtaining a court order for eviction— self-help evictions are illegal in Vermont Failure to follow these steps can delay the process and may expose the landlord to legal liability. Contact Deppman Law PLC Today Whether you're a landlord trying to understand your rights or a tenant facing eviction, Vermont’s landlord-tenant laws can be complex—and the consequences of missteps can be serious. At Deppman Law PLC , we help clients across Vermont resolve rental disputes, comply with local ordinances, and protect their legal interests. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and get experienced guidance tailored to your situation.