Mediation vs. Litigation
March 26, 2024

Choosing the Right Approach for Your Vermont Divorce


Even the most straightforward divorces can become emotionally charged and complicated, leaving couples struggling with decisions about how to proceed. One of the most important choices a divorcing couple must make is whether to resolve their differences through mediation or litigation. Both options have their merits, but understanding their distinct differences is critical for making a decision that aligns with your needs and goals.


What is Mediation?


Mediation is a voluntary process in which divorcing couples work with a neutral third-party mediator to resolve their disputes outside of court. The mediator facilitates communication, assists in identifying issues, and helps the parties generate solutions that are acceptable to both sides. In Vermont, mediation is often encouraged as a means of reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement while minimizing conflict and litigation costs. Some of the many benefits of mediation include: 


Control and Flexibility 


Mediation empowers couples to maintain control over the outcome of their divorce by actively participating in the decision-making process. Unlike litigation, where a judge makes decisions based on legal arguments and evidence presented in court, mediation allows couples to tailor solutions that meet their unique needs and circumstances.


Cost-Effectiveness


Mediation typically involves fewer legal fees and court costs compared to litigation. Since the process focuses on resolving issues collaboratively, it can be more efficient and less time-consuming than waiting for court dates and engaging in lengthy legal battles.


Preservation of Relationships


Mediation fosters open communication and cooperation, which can be beneficial, especially when children are involved. By working together to find solutions, couples may preserve a more amicable relationship post-divorce, which can be advantageous for co-parenting and future interactions.


What is Litigation?


Litigation involves resolving divorce-related disputes through the court system, with each party represented by their respective attorneys. In Vermont, litigation typically follows a formal process, including pleadings, discovery, hearings, and, if necessary, trial. While litigation may be necessary in cases involving significant conflict or complex legal issues, it often entails a more adversarial approach compared to mediation. That being said, litigation does offer certain benefits over mediation, including:


Legal Protections and Adjudication


Litigation provides a structured legal process wherein a judge impartially evaluates the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. This can be advantageous in cases where there are concerns about fairness or when one party is unwilling to negotiate in good faith.


Binding Decisions


In litigation, court orders are legally binding and enforceable, providing a level of certainty and finality to the resolution of divorce-related issues such as property division, child custody, and spousal support.


Legal Advocacy


Each party has the opportunity to advocate for their interests and rights through legal representation in court. Attorneys can provide valuable guidance, protect their clients' legal rights, and ensure that their voices are heard throughout the litigation process.


Choosing the Right Approach for Your Divorce


Ultimately, the decision to pursue mediation or litigation depends on your unique circumstances, including the level of cooperation between you and your spouse, the complexity of your financial and familial situation, and your desired outcome for the divorce process. While mediation offers many benefits, it may not be suitable for every situation, particularly if there are concerns about power imbalances, domestic violence, or complex legal issues.


Deppman Law, PLC — Experienced Divorce Lawyers Serving All of Vermont 


At Deppman Law, PLC, we understand that every divorce is unique, and we are committed to helping our clients navigate the process in a way that meets their needs and goals. Whether you choose mediation, litigation, or alternative dispute resolution methods, our experienced family law team is here to provide guidance, support, and advocacy every step of the way. Contact Deppman Law, PLC, today to schedule a consultation.

Buying a Home With Someone You’re Not Married To

July 16, 2026
Buying a home with a partner, friend, or family member can make homeownership more attainable and allow two people to invest in property together. But when co-owners are not married, many of the legal protections and rules that apply to married couples do not necessarily apply in the same way. Before purchasing a home together, it’s important to think beyond the down payment and mortgage. Considerations such as how expenses will be divided and what happens if one person's circumstances change are much easier to address before closing than after a disagreement arises. Decide How You Will Own the Property One of the first decisions co-buyers will need to make is how title to the property will be held. The form of ownership can affect each person's rights in the property and what happens to an owner's interest if that person dies. The deed should also accurately reflect the ownership arrangement the buyers intend. A 50/50 split may make sense when both people are contributing equally, but that may not always be the case. One buyer might provide most of the down payment while the other contributes more toward the monthly mortgage or improvements to the property. Those differences should be discussed before the purchase. Simply contributing more money does not necessarily mean that a person will automatically receive a greater ownership interest or be entitled to reimbursement later. Buyers should understand how their contributions relate to their legal ownership and document their intentions accordingly. Plan for the Costs of Owning the Home The purchase price is only the beginning of the financial relationship between co-owners. Mortgage payments, property taxes, insurance, utilities, routine maintenance, and major repairs all create ongoing obligations. A written agreement can establish how those expenses will be divided and how decisions about the property will be made. It can also address less predictable situations. If the roof needs to be replaced, for example, are both owners responsible for half? What if one owner pays for a significant renovation that increases the property's value? What happens if one person temporarily cannot contribute toward the mortgage? Working through these questions in advance can prevent uncertainty about whether a payment was intended as a shared expense, a loan, or an additional investment in the property. Co-owners should also understand that ownership of the home and responsibility for the mortgage are separate issues. The names appearing on the deed determine ownership, while the loan documents determine who is legally responsible for repaying the mortgage. The way those documents are structured can have significant consequences for both parties. Consider What Happens If One Person Wants Out It may feel uncomfortable to discuss the end of a living arrangement while preparing to buy a home together, but it is one of the most important conversations unmarried co-buyers can have. Circumstances change. One person may want to relocate, experience a financial setback, enter a new relationship, or simply decide that joint ownership no longer works. Without an agreement, the owners may disagree about whether the property should be sold, whether one person can buy out the other, or how the home's value should be determined. A co-ownership agreement can establish a process before those issues arise. It might address how a buyout will work, how the property will be valued, how sale proceeds will be divided, and what happens if the owners cannot agree about whether to sell. The agreement can also address what should happen if an owner dies and how that person's interest in the property will be handled. Contact Deppman Law PLC  Buying a home together is a significant financial commitment, regardless of the relationship between the buyers. Taking the time to establish a clear ownership arrangement and put expectations in writing can help protect both parties and reduce the potential for disputes later. If you are considering purchasing Vermont real estate with a partner, friend, or family member, contact Deppman Law PLC for guidance on structuring the purchase and creating a co-ownership agreement that addresses your needs.

Buying a Small Business in Vermont and What to Know Before You Sign

June 17, 2026
Buying an existing business can be an appealing alternative to starting one from scratch. The customer base, employees, equipment, vendor relationships, and operating history may already be in place. But a business that looks successful from the outside can come with obligations and risks that are not immediately apparent. Before signing a purchase agreement, buyers should understand exactly what obligations may come with the transaction and whether the business is in the financial and legal position the seller has represented. Look Beyond the Financial Statements Financial records are an important part of evaluating a potential acquisition, but due diligence should extend well beyond revenue and profitability. A buyer should review the business's tax records, debts, pending or threatened litigation, insurance coverage, licenses and permits, and any liens or other claims involving business assets. Existing contracts also deserve careful attention. Agreements with customers, vendors, suppliers, lenders, and other third parties can have a significant impact on the value of the business. Some contracts may be transferred to a new owner, while others require consent or contain provisions allowing the other party to terminate the agreement after a change in ownership. If the business operates from leased property, the commercial lease can be equally important. Buyers should understand how much time remains on the lease, renewal options, rent increases, maintenance obligations, and whether the landlord must approve an assignment or a new lease. Vermont buyers should also be aware of state-specific obligations that can arise in connection with a business transfer. For example, Vermont law includes notice requirements involving certain bulk transfers of business assets and provisions that may affect a buyer that continues the operations of an existing employer. Know the Value of What You Are Buying Employees can be one of a business's most valuable assets, particularly when customer relationships or specialized knowledge depend on particular people. Before closing, buyers should understand the existing workforce, compensation and benefits, employment agreements, accrued obligations, and any ongoing employment disputes. In Vermont, acquiring and continuing an existing business can also have implications for unemployment insurance. Under certain circumstances, an acquiring business may be treated as a successor employer, and the predecessor's experience-rating record may transfer to the successor. Buyers should also identify precisely which physical and intangible assets are included in the purchase. Depending on the business, that might include equipment, inventory, vehicles, intellectual property, websites and domain names, customer information, trade names, or other valuable rights. It is important to determine not only that the seller possesses these assets, but also whether they are subject to liens or security interests that need to be addressed before closing. Asset Purchase or Equity Purchase? One of the most important decisions in structuring an acquisition is whether to purchase the assets of the business or the ownership interests in the company itself. In an asset purchase, the buyer generally purchases specifically identified assets and assumes only the liabilities identified in the agreement, subject to applicable law. This structure can give the parties greater ability to define what is — and is not — part of the transaction. In an equity purchase, the buyer purchases ownership of the existing company. The business entity continues to own its assets and remain subject to its contractual obligations and liabilities. That makes a careful investigation of the company's history particularly important. Neither structure is automatically better. Tax consequences, contracts, licenses, liabilities, financing, and the buyer's plans for the business can all influence how a transaction should be structured. Contact Deppman Law PLC Purchasing a business is a significant investment, and issues discovered after closing can be far more difficult and expensive to address than those identified during negotiations. An attorney can help evaluate the proposed transaction, conduct legal due diligence, identify potential risks, and prepare or review the agreements necessary to protect the buyer's interests. If you are considering buying a business in Vermont, contact Deppman Law PLC to learn more about the acquisition process and the steps you can take before signing.